Preview

Russia & World: Sc. Dialogue

Advanced search

Post-Soviet Civilizational Transit in Central Asia

https://doi.org/10.53658/RW2024-4-2(12)-160-173

Abstract

The relationship between politics and history is becoming complex and tense in the former Soviet republics of Central Asia. The history of the countries and peoples of the region becomes the subject of an intense ideological struggle, during which Soviet historiography is partially, and sometimes completely, rejected, and new ideological myths are created that have no real historical basis. Not only historiography is being rethought, but also its context – historical memory, the historical culture of the new states of Central Asia. On the one hand, the ruling elites seek to place the historical memory of the Central Asian peoples under strict state control, affirming the ideology of state nationalism and referring to it not only political doctrines, but also traditions, religion, philosophy, social and human sciences. The rejection of society from cultural memory is typical for Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan. On the other hand, historical memory becomes an ideological tool of intra-elite political struggle and society (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan). This is the essence of the post-Soviet civilizational transit in Central Asia.

About the Author

R. S. Bobokhonov
Center for Civilizational and Regional Studies of the Institute of Africa of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Rakhimbek S. BOBOKHONOV - CandSc (Hist.). Senior Researcher

30/1, Spiridonovka str., Moscow, 123001



References

1. Abashin S.N. Soviet village: between colonialism and modernization. Moscow: New Literary Review, 2015:848.

2. Afghanistan and the security of Central Asia. Vol. 1 / Ed. A.A. Knyazeva. Bishkek: Ilim, 2004:639. [In Russian].

3. Bobokhonov R.S. Some issues of the historiography of Tajikistan in modern and contemporary times. Politika i obshhestvo /[Politics and Society]. 2012; 6:73-84 [In Russian].

4. Bushuev V.V. Historical politics of modern states: the problem of definition and research methodology. Social`no-gumanitarny`e znaniya [Social and humanitarian knowledge]. 2012; 3:285-302 [In Russian].

5. Kazantsev A. Secular statehood before the challenge of radical Islam. Valdajskie zapiski [Valdai Notes]. 2016; 2(42):3-11 [In Russian].

6. Larina E.I. National identity and traditional social institutions in Central Asia. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Moscow University]. Ser. 8. History. 2012; 4:66-67 [In Russian].

7. Marmontova T.V., Tazhibaev A.T., Shamsieva I.M., Makhmutkhojaeva L.S., Kozhirova S.B. Central Asia – Russia: Opportunities and Limitations in Building a Joint Future (Foresight Analysis) // Russia & World: Scientific Dialogue. 2023;1(7):66-77 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.53658/RW2023-3-1(7)-66-77.

8. Mikhalev, A.V., Rakhimov, K.K. Central Asia and the Struggle for Soviet Legacy. Russia in Global Affairs. 2023, 21(1):153-162. [In Russian]. DOI: 10.31278/1810-6439-2023-21-1-153-162.

9. Repina L.P. Theoretical foundations and prospects of regional history. Prepodavatel`[Teacher]. XXI century. 2013; 3:266-273 [In Russian].

10. Eisenstadt S.N. Multiply Modernity.Daedalus, Cambridge. 2000; Vol.129. 1:1-30 [In English].


Review

For citations:


Bobokhonov R.S. Post-Soviet Civilizational Transit in Central Asia. Russia & World: Sc. Dialogue. 2024;(2):160-173. https://doi.org/10.53658/RW2024-4-2(12)-160-173

Views: 223


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2782-3067 (Print)