Preview

Russia & World: Sc. Dialogue

Advanced search

Integration Projects and Institutional Matrices

https://doi.org/10.53658/RW2024-4-3(13)-132-141

Abstract

In this paper, an attempt is made to understand the reasons for the formation of a particular order in a region based on the institutional approach. The connection between regional order and regional regulation with the type of institutional matrices of integrating countries is shown. It is established that when integrating social systems in order to mitigate possible institutional imbalances, institutions complementary to those dominant in the institutional matrix are used: when integrating X-matrix countries – market institutions and vice versa. The factors blocking regionalism in  integration projects involving countries with institutional matrices of the same type include: the presence of one clearly expressed hegemon and its support of supranational regulatory bodies, the presence of federal rather than unitary states in the region. It has been established that for countries with different types of institutional matrix, convergence is possible (for example, cooperation in the security sphere, participation in the Free Trade Zone), but integration in this case will be limited to only certain areas that are of exceptional importance for social systems, with the prevalence of regionalization processes (integration “from below” without the creation of any significant and effective supranational bodies). Factors that hinder the development of both regionalism and regionalization are increasing political differences between countries, polarization along religious lines, manifestations of nationalism and racism.

About the Author

Р. A. Barakhvostov
Belarusian State Economic University
Belarus

Pavel A. Barakhvostov - CandSc. (Polit.). Associate Professor. Associate Professor of the Department of Political Science

26, Partizansky Prospekt, Minsk, 22070



References

1. Baikov А.А. Comparative integration. Practices and models of integration in foreign Europe and Pacific Asia. Мoscow: Аspect Press, 2012 [In Russian].

2. Durkheim E. Sociology. Its subject, method, purpose. Moscow, Каnon, 1995 [In Russian].

3. Kirdina S.G. Institutional Matrices and Russia’s Development: An Introduction to X-Y Theory. Saint- Petersburg: Nestor-Istoria, 2014 [In Russian].

4. Kirdina S.G. The role of institutions and geography in economic development: current controversy in heterodox economics. Spatial Economics, 2016; 3:133–150 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.14530/se.2016.3.133–150.

5. Lagutina M.L. Global region as an element of the world political system of the 21st century. Comparative politics. 2015; 2(19):16–21 [In Russian].

6. Libman А. М. “Integration from below” in Central Asia. Journal of Eurasian Economic Integration, 2009; 1:006–026 [In Russian].

7. Acharya A. Whose Ideas Matter? Agency and Power in Asian Regionalism. Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press, 2009 [In English]. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-165X.2010.tb02069.

8. Ballinger P., Brunswick M. Beyond the “New” Regional Question? Regions, Territoriality, and the Space of Anthropology in Southeastern Europe. Regions, Regional Identity and Regionalism in Southeastern Europe. U. Brunnbaer Ethologia Balkanica. 2007; 11:59–79 [In English].

9. Beeson M. Asymmetrical Regionalism: China, Southeast Asia and Uneven Development. East Asia, 2010; 27(4):329–343 [In English]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-010-9121-0.

10. Flockhart T. The Liberal International Order and Peaceful Change: Spillover and the Importance of Values, Visions, and Passions. Ethics & International Affairs. 2020; 34(4):521–533 [In English].

11. Gallup J.L., Sachs J., Mellinger A. Geography and Economic Development. International Regional Science Review. 1999; 22:179–232 [In English]. https://doi.org/10.3386/w6849.

12. Ghica L.A. Beyond Regional Integration? Social Constructivism, Regional Cohesiveness and the Regionalism Puzzle. Studia Politica. Romanian Political Science Review. 2013; 13(4): 733–752 [In English].

13. Hausmann R., Pritchett L., Rodrik D. Growth accelerations. Journal of Economic Growth. 2005; 10(4):303–329 [In English]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887–005–4712–0.

14. Katzenstein P., Okawara N. Japan and Asian-Pacific Security. Rethinking Security in East Asia: Identity, Power, and Efficiency, J.J.Suh, P.Katzenstein, and A.Carlson (eds.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2004:97–130 [In English]. https://doi.org/10.1162/016228801753399754.

15. Katzenstein P.J. A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2005 [In English]. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501700385

16. MacIntyre A., Ravenhill J. The Future of Asian regional institutions. Integrating Regions: Asia in Comparative Context, M Kahler and A.MacIntyre (eds.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2013:245–266 [In English].

17. Murden S.W. The Secondary Institutions of the Middle Eastern Regional Interstate Society. International Society and the Middle East: English School Theory at the Regional Level, B. Buzan and A. Gonzalez-Pelaez (eds.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009:117–139 [In English].

18. North D.C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1990 [In English]. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678.

19. Orford A. Regional Orders, Geopolitics, and the Future of International Law. Current Legal Problems, 2021; 74 (1):149–194 [In English].

20. Pomfret R. Different Paths to Economic Integration in Europe and Asia. ADBI Working Paper 1063. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute, 2019 [In English]. Available: https://www.adb.org/publications/different-paths-economic-integration-europe-and-asia.

21. Solingen E. Regional Order at Century’s Dawn: Global and Domestic Influences and Grand Strategy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998 [In English].

22. Tripp C. Regional Organizations in the Arab Middle East. Regionalism in World Politics: Regional Organization and International Order. Fawcett and A.Hurrell (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995:283–308 [In English].


Review

For citations:


Barakhvostov Р.A. Integration Projects and Institutional Matrices. Russia & World: Sc. Dialogue. 2024;(3):132-141. https://doi.org/10.53658/RW2024-4-3(13)-132-141

Views: 129


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2782-3067 (Print)