Hybridization of Religious Institutions as Indicator of Spiritual and Moral Crisis
https://doi.org/10.53658/RW2024-4-4(14)-151-163
Abstract
In this paper, the phenomenon of social crisis is studied within the framework of the institutional approach supplemented with the theory of institutional matrices (IM). It is shown that the crisis of the social system constitutes an irreparable disbalance in the institutional matrix, which leads to its inability to develop along the established trajectory. The existence of a historically invariant indicator of the crisis of the sociocultural subsystem has been established - the hybridization of religious institutions. This phenomenon is discussed in detail using the example of crises during the Middle Ages in Byzantium and Western Europe. Christianity, when in crisis, is determined to face, independently of the matrix type, hybridization with pre-Christian practices and elements of the religions of the societies in contact (in particular, Islam). The purpose of such hybridization, initiated either from the above (by the authorities) or from the below (by the grass roots), is in strengthening the dominant (determining the social identity of society) or the complementary (performing the compensatory function) institutions in the institutional matrix. It is shown that upon strengthening the dominant institutions in the institutional matrix with the aim of overcoming the crisis the complementary institutions cannot be totally eradicated. Besides, the formed institutional hybrid is more sustainable and its formation helps to solve the crisis in the long run only when the process of hybridization takes into account the geographical factors of the environment in which society lives. The hybridization, studied in this paper, indicates that religions in their development interpenetrated each other much more than is commonly recognized, and the experience of such hybridization is the most solid foundation for fruitful interfaith dialogue.
About the Author
P. A. BarakhvostovBelarus
Pavel A. Barakhvostov - CandSc. (Polit.). Associate Professor. Associate Professor of the Department of Political Science,
26, Partizansky Prospekt, Minsk, 22070
References
1. Vildanov I.E., Paderin V.K. Crisis as an indicator of urgent social changes. Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta [Scientific notes of Kazan University]. 2008; 150(4):201–207 [In Russian].
2. Volkov Yu.G., Dakoro М.А., Sagalaeva Е.S., Talanova К.S. Spiritual and moral crisis in Russia: static characteristics. Social’no-gumanitarnye znanija [Social and humanitarian knowledge]. 2014; 12:7– 13 [In Russuan].
3. Grinin L.Е., Korotaev А.V. Cycles, crises, traps of the modern world system: study of kondratieff, juglar and secular cycles, global crises, malthusian and post-malthusian traps. Мoscow: Izd-vo LKI, 2012 [In Russian].
4. Gryzunova Е.А. Concepts of social system crisis: comparative analysis. Vestnik MGIMO [MGIMO Review of International Relations]. 2012; 4:270–276 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.24833/20718160-2012-4-25-270-276.
5. Dobren’kov В.I., Кravchenko А.I. Fundamental sociology (in 5 vols). Vol. 6. Social deformations. Moscow: INFRA-М, 2005 [In Russian].
6. Kirdina S.G. Institutional matrices and Russia’s development: An introduction to X-Y theory. SaintPetersburg: Nestor-Istoriya, 2014 [In Russian].
7. Kurilo S.N. The spiritual and moral crisis of man as a consequence of the transitional stage of society: statement of the problem. Istoricheskaja i social’no-obrazovatel’naja mysl’ [Historical and socio-educational thought]. 2015; 7(2):137–140 [In Russian].
8. Leontiev А.N. The emergence and evolution of the psyche. Izbrannye psihologicheskie proizvedenija (in 2 vols), Vol. 1. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1983:143–279 [In Russian].
9. Letnyakov D.E. Political and ideological trends in post-Soviet societies: an attempt of generalization. Polis. Politicheskije issledivanija [Polis. Political Studies]. 2018; 1:129–142 [In Russian].
10. Malaya А.V. Socio-economic crisis: comparative analysis and ways to its overcome. Strategija i taktika upravlenija predprijatiem v perehodnoj jekonomike. Astrakhan, 2017:29–30 [In Russian].
11. Rozhdestvenskaya I.А., Tambovtsev V.L. Import of institutions and diffusion of ideas. AlterEconomics. 2019; 16(3):468–479 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.31063/2073-6517/2019.163.14.
12. Sukhiv А.N. Socio-economic crisis: theoretical aspect. Chelovecheskij capital [Human capital]. 2018; 2:94–99 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.25629/HC.2018.02.11.
13. Talanova К.S. Theoretical problems of sociological research of the spiritual and moral crisis in modern Russia. Social’no-gumanitarnye znanija [Social and humanitarian knowledge]. 2014; 12:328–333 [In Russian].
14. Shtompka, P. Sociology. Analysis of modern society. Moscow: Lagos, 2005 [In Russian].
15. Shchipkov А.V. Systemic crisis of society and the state of post-capitalism. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of philosophy]. 2019; 9:40–49 [In Russian].
16. Barakhvostov P.A. The Compensatory Function of Religious Institutions in the Society’s Institutional Matrix. Mir Rossii. 2023; 32(4):56–70 [In English]. https://doi.org/10.17323/1811038X-2023-32-4-56-70.
17. Bréhier L. Le Monde Byzantin, Tome 1: Vie et Mort de Byzance. Paris: Albin Michel, 1947 [In French].
18. North D.C. Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1991; 5(1):97–112 [In English].
19. E. A Manual of Roman Law: The Ecloga. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 1926 [In English].
20. Harris E.J. Utilizing the Theology of Religions and Human Geography to Understand the Spatial Dimension of Religion and Conflict. Religions, 2022; 13(6):496 [In English]. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13060496.
21. Richardson M. Geographic Roots, Anthropological Routes: New Avenues in Geographies of Religions. Geography Compass. 2022; 16(3):e12613 [In English]. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12613.
22. Voigt S. Determinants of Social Norms I–The Role of Geography. Journal of Institutional Economics,.2024; 20:e5 [In English]. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137423000310.
Review
For citations:
Barakhvostov P.A. Hybridization of Religious Institutions as Indicator of Spiritual and Moral Crisis. Russia & World: Sc. Dialogue. 2024;(4):151-163. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.53658/RW2024-4-4(14)-151-163