Foreign Countries Humanitarian Policy in the South Caucasus: on the Materials of the International Round Table

The article reflects the most interesting opinions expressed during the international round table “Humanitarian Policy of Extra-Regional Actors in the South Caucasus”, organized by the National Research Institute for Communications Development in partnership with the Center for International and Strategic Studies of the Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation. A comprehensive view of humanitarian policy in the context of geopolitical and economic interests of countries is presented. Emphasis is made on the policies of the United States, Turkey, Iran, and their rivalry among themselves. Humanitarian policy is considered an integral part of foreign policy. Historically, the United States views South Caucasus as a space for a geopolitical game in the struggle for influence with Russia. But the general course for the “strategic defeat” of Moscow forced the American leadership to look for options on how to increase pressure, this time through Armenia. Iran’s humanitarian policy is characterized in the article as “smart power”. The concept of cultural diplomacy in Iran’s foreign policy indicates a shift in emphasis in resolving interstate contradictions from the level of military and political rivalry to the socio-cultural and spiritual level of cooperation. Turkey skillfully combines the tools of economic and cultural influence to achieve political interests. Russia’s humanitarian policy is based on preserving cultural and historical ties, forming an objective image of Russia, and preserving the Russian language as a language of communication.

1. Areshev A.G. Europe between Baku and Yerevan: Whose Arguments Will Win? Archon [Arkhon]. 2019; 4 (13):21–24 [In Russian].

2. Areshev A.G. Free Economic Zone in Meghri and Iran’s Trade and Economic Cooperation with the Countries of the South Caucasus. Trudy Instituta vostokovedeniya RAN [Proceedings of the Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. 2018; 15:95–106 [In Russian].

3. Armenia in the EAEU and the Greater Eurasian Partnership. Collection of articles. Yerevan: National Research Institute for Communications Development, 2024:64 [In Russian]. ISBN 9789939-9740-2-6. EDN LWPPWR.

4. Arshakyan G.M., Safaryan A.V. On the Nature and Dynamics of the Development of Russian-Turkish Relations in the Post-Soviet Period. Rossiya i mir: nauchnyj dialog [Russia & World: Scientific Dialogue]. 2023; 1(7):40–53 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.53658/RW2023-3-1(7)-40-53.

5. Akhmatshina E.K., Luchenkov I.R. Turkish-Adjarian Relations in the Post-Soviet Period: Religious and Economic Aspect (1991-2018). Kaspiyskiy region: politika. ekonomika. kultura. [Caspian Region: Politics, Economics, Culture.] 2023; 1(74):102–106 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.54398/1818510X_2023_1_102. EDN HWBKQQ.

6. Burtseva I.S. Educational Projects of the “European Neighborhood Policy” as a Tool of “Soft Power”. Druzhba bez granits: mif ili realnost. [Friendship without Borders: Myth or Reality]: collection of materials of the International scientific and practical conference, Stavropol, December 14, 2017 / Public Chamber of the Russian Federation; All-Russian public movement “Mothers of Russia”; Institute of Friendship of Peoples of the Caucasus. Stavropol: Institute of Friendship of Peoples of the Caucasus, 2017: 90 [In Russian]. EDN YQORPB.

7. Gagieva A.L., Komleva V.V. Russia and South Ossetia: Cooperation in the Field of Education. Rossiya i mir: nauchnyj dialog [Russia & World: Scientific Dialogue]. 2024; 1(11):66–83 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.53658/RW2024-4-1(11)-66-83. EDN VIDGMQ.

8. Davydenko R.E. “Engagement Strategy” or the Tactics of “Imposed Consensus” in US Foreign Policy in the 21st Century: Examples of Post-Soviet Countries and Eastern Europe. Zimnyaya konferentsiya Studencheskogo nauchnogo obshchestva [SSS Winter Conference]: Trends and Challenges of Modern Diplomacy: Collection of Articles from the First International Student Scientific Conference, St. Petersburg, December 3–4, 2021 / ed. D.I. Popov [et al.]. St. Petersburg: Skifia-Print LLC, 2022:174–183 [In Russian]. EDN WDPJOK.

9. Enokyan A.V., Zakaryan S.B., Turava G.M. Educational policy of the European Union, Turkey and Russia towards Georgia at the beginning of the 21st century. Voprosy istorii [History Problems]. 2021; 8–1:18–30 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.31166/VoprosyIstorii202108Statyi03. EDN YVHIJD.

10. Enokyan A.V., Stanis D.V. The Factor of “Soft Power” Policy in Promoting Turkish Interests in Georgia. Postsovetskiye issledovaniya [Post-Soviet Studies]. 2022; 5(8):787–798 [In Russian]. EDN JQXOBD.

11. Komleva V.V. Dynamics of Friendliness of Communication Regimes of the South Caucasus Countries. Rossiya i mir: nauchnyj dialog [Russia & World: Scientific Dialogue]. 2024; 1(11):20–37 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.53658/RW2024-4-1(11)-20-37. EDN FCMMWH.

12. Komleva V.V. National Cultural Heritage Policy and Friendliness of Communication Regimes of Neighboring Countries. (Based on the Annual Monitoring of Post-Soviet Countries). Prodvizheniye natsionalnogo kulturnogo naslediya v elektronnoy srede v tselyakh sokhraneniya i ukrepleniya traditsionnykh rossiyskikh dukhovno-nravstvennykh tsennostey [Promotion of National Cultural Heritage in the Electronic Environment in Order to Preserve and Strengthen Traditional Russian Spiritual and Moral Values: Methodology, Experience, Development Directions]: Collection of Scientific Papers, St. Petersburg, May 23, 2023 / B.N.Yeltsin Presidential Library. St. Petersburg: B.N.Yeltsin Presidential Library, 2023:47–56 [In Russian]. EDN HHUYGA.

13. Meister Sh. Georgian-Russian Relations: The Role of Discourses and Narrative. Tbilisi, 2021 [In Russian].

14. Mamedov R.T. “Soft Power” as Part of Turkish Foreign Policy in Georgia. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. [Bulletin of Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia]. Series: International Relations. 2023; 23(4):734–747 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-06602023-23-4-734-747. EDN PPIALJ.

15. Machavariani G.G. Georgia-China: Political, Economic and Humanitarian Aspects of Cooperation. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov [Bulletin of Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: International Relations. 2015; 1:142–151. [In Russian]. EDN TMGEDZ.

16. Naumov A.O., Naumova A.Yu. The Role of Soft Power Actors in the Rose Revolution in Georgia. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Moscow University]. Series 21: Management (State and Society). 2023; 1:58–76 [In Russian]. EDN LVXUHJ.

17. Neklyudov N.Ya., Slinko A.A. Soft Power at the Crossroads of Borders: On the Issue of Religious and Cultural Interaction between Russia, Turkey, and Iran in Georgia. Aspirantskiye tetradi [Postgraduate Notebooks]: Collection of Research Articles, Voronezh, January 31, 2018 / Voronezh Branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. Issue 2. Voronezh: Voronezh Branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, 2018:119–129 [In Russian]. EDN YQPARM.

18. The Policy of Influence of Global Actors in Central Asia, Eastern Europe, the South Caucasus and the Baltic States / A.A. Sidorov, L.G. Silantieva, A.V. Kashtanov [et al.]. Moscow: Pero Publishing House, 2023:146 [In Russian]. ISBN 978-5-00218-513-9. EDN LLCECE.

19. Ravandi-fadai L.M. Aspects of Politics and Security in the South Caucasus. Rossiya i Zakavkazye v istoricheskom izmerenii i prostranstve [Russia and Transcaucasia in the Historical Dimension and Space] (on the 240th Anniversary of the Signing of the Treaty of Georgievsk): Collection of Materials from the International Scientific Round Table. Stavropol, 2023:304–310 [In Russian].

20. Ravandi-Fadai L.M. Features of the Functioning of the Majlis (Parliament) of the Islamic Republic of Iran Vlast [Power.] 2024; 32(S4-1):98–106 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.56700/s1578-76637703-f.

21. Rtskhiladze G.V. On the Absence of Russian “Soft Power” on the Example of Georgia. Novaya identichnost i konfliktnyy potentsial postsovetskogo prostranstva [New Identity and Conflict Potential of the Post-Soviet Space]: Collection of Scientific Articles. On the 25th Anniversary of the CIS / edited by K.P. Kurylev. Moscow: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN), 2017:107– 112 [In Russian]. EDN ZVLNGN.

22. Sun Zhuangzhi, Karpovich O.G., Vlasov E.E., Sidorova L.N., Kozyulin V.B., Li Yonghui, Dobrovolsky V.N., Ouyang Xiangying, Dmitrieva M.O., Grishanov A.A., Niu Yichen, Martynova D.O., Qiang Xiaoyun, Lukin A.L., Dong Xianzhong, Kozinets A.I., Wang Xianju, Kozlov L.E., Shang Yue. East Asia and the Asia-Pacific Region: Actors and Tasks of the Regional Architecture of the World Order. Izvestiya Vostochnogo instituta [Bulletin of the Eastern Institute]. 2024; 2:11–33 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.24866/2542-1611/2024-2/11-33.

23. Urigaev V.V. Turkey’s “Soft Power” in Influencing Georgia and the Black Sea Region Teorii i problemy politicheskikh issledovaniy [Theories and Problems of Political Research]. 2019; 8(3A):147–152 [In Russian]. EDN SXDATZ.

24. Khaindrava I. Russian-Georgian Relations: In Search of New Paths of Development / Russian International Affairs Council. International Center on Conflicts and Negotiations. Moscow: Spetskniga, 2014 [In Russian].

25. Tsurtsumia Z. History of Russian “Soft Power” in Georgia (19th-20th Centuries) Turetskiy zhurnal rossiyskikh issledovaniy [Turkish Journal of Russian Studies]. 2020; 3:94–115 [In Russian]. EDN LBDZQN.

26. Areshev A. Turkey’s Activity in the Caucasus. Russia in Global Affairs. 2020; Vol. 18; 4 (72):56–60 [In English]. https://doi.org/10.31278/1810-6374-2020-18-4-56-60.

27. Ravandi-Fadai L., McNeer K. Shadows in the Garden: Women Agents Underground and Communist Activism in Mid-20th Century Iran Vostok. Afro-Aziatskie Obshchestva: Istoriia i Sovremennost. 2022.; 6:88–100 [In English].