Preview

Russia & World: Sc. Dialogue

Advanced search

The Symbolic Capital of Great Britain – the Crisis that has Matured

https://doi.org/10.53658/RW2025-4-3(17)-156-170

Abstract

This study attempts to analyze the current realities and crisis manifestations in the sphere of symbolic capital in the United Kingdom, which is directly related to the structure of power, prestige, and identity. Based on the methodology of P. Bourdieu, who makes it possible to identify symbolic space with physical space through the projection of the distribution of certain types of capital, thus defining social structure, we find ourselves in a space where one type of capital – symbolic - has the ability to shape a stable image of formalized social communities – countries, states, as the most attractive for many people. Using this advantage, Great Britain has created and maintained the image of its fundamental institutions, such as Monarchy, Parliament, the Anglican Church, education, and cultural heritage, as prestigious manifestations of culture and social development, thereby creating an aura of high-quality communities.. The research question that we analyze is how coherent these institutions are today with the social dynamics of the modern British community. What are their main problems and how do the British themselves assess their effectiveness and recognition? The main hypothesis accompanying this research and which we come to confirm at the end is that behind the “facade of symbolic Great Britain” a deep socio-economic and spiritual crisis is hidden.

About the Author

E. B. Makarov
Russian Association of Baltic Studies
Russian Federation

Evgeniy B. MAKAROV. Assistant of the President

3, lit. A, Medikov ave., St. Petersburg, 197022



References

1. Ananyeva E.V. Britain: New Premieres, a New Monarch through the Prism of Political culture. Sovremennaya Evropa [Modern Europe]. 2022; 6 [In Russian].

2. Bourdieu P. Sociology of social space. Moscow: Institut eksperimental’noj sociologii [Institute of Experimental Sociology]; St. Petersburg: Aletejya [Aleteya], 2007 [In Russian].

3. Quigley C. The Anglo-American Establishment. Moscow: Nashe Zavtra [Our Tomorrow], 2021 [In Russian].

4. Ovchinnikov V.V. Sakura and Oak: Sakura branch; Oak roots. Moscow: Drofa, 2005 [In Russian].

5. Ostapenko G.S. The Modern History of Great Britain: XX – the beginning of the XXI century: a textbook. Moscow: Infra–M, 2023 [In Russian].

6. Ostapenko G.S., Arkhipova L.V. The British Monarchy: from the Past to the Future? Nauchnoanaliticheskij vestnik IE RAN [Scientific and Analytical Bulletin of IE RAS]. 2024; 3:86–99 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.15211/vestnikieran320248699.

7. Beer S., Diamond P. Power and Prosperity. How A Radical Labour Government Can Transform Britain. The Fabian Society, 2024 [In English].

8. Cockayne J. «Are You Really Anglicans?» Reflections on Church Planting, Innovation and Ecclesiastical Authority in the Church of England. Journal of Anglican Studies. Published online. 2024:1–22 [In English]. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1740355324000329.

9. Erlandson C. The Issue of Anglican Identity. Cranmer. Theological Journal. 2024; 1(1):3–17 [In English]. https://doi.org/10.62221/ctj.2024.102.

10. Holmes S.E, Olorenshaw E., Casson A. Is there a place for young children in the modern-day UK church? Investigating approaches to faith nurture in the early years. British Journal of Religious Education. 2024:1–15 [In English]. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2024.2373756.


Review

For citations:


Makarov E.B. The Symbolic Capital of Great Britain – the Crisis that has Matured. Russia & World: Sc. Dialogue. 2025;(3):156-170. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.53658/RW2025-4-3(17)-156-170

Views: 8


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2782-3067 (Print)