Information sovereignity: materials of scientific discussion
https://doi.org/10.53658/RW2022-2-2(4)-100-131
Abstract
The article contains the most significant and interesting materials of the scientific discussion on the problems of information sovereignty and information security in Russia held by the National Research Institute for the Communications Development. The authors identify the main threats and risks to the stability of the Russian Federation in the era of digitalization. Approaches to the definition of the concept of «information sovereignity» are considered, its criteria are defined. Problems of ensuring the information sovereignity of Russia are identified, in particular, relating to Russia’s technological dependence on foreign technologies and equipment, weak security of the Russian information infrastructure. During the discussion, recommendations were developed: 1) significantly increase the financing of the Russian high-tech industry, support Russian research in the field of computer technology in order to reduce dependence on foreign products to a minimum and increase the security of critical infrastructure facilities; 2) to continue the development of a special direction in the sphere of cybersecurity in the Russian Armed Forces, increase military potential in the sphere of digital technologies; 3) to pursue an active information policy aimed at combating false messages; 4) to monitor the dissemination of illegal information in social networks; 5) to begin the implementation of state policy in the field of public education on information security, rules for safe interaction with digital technologies; 6) to strengthen control over illegal activities on the Internet.
About the Authors
N. P. GribinRussian Federation
GRIBIN Nikolai P. DSc (Law). Professor. Leading Researcher, Institute of International Studies.
76 Vernadsky Avenue, Moscow, 119454, Russian Federation.
I. N. Kohtyulina
Russian Federation
KOKHTYULINA Irina N. CandSc (Polit). Scientific Secretary of the Scientific Council.
8 Dvintsev str., office 1, Moscow, 127018, Russian Federation.
D. I. Sedunov
Russian Federation
SEDUNOV Denis I. Postgraduate student.
2 Vernadsky Avenue, Moscow, 119571, Russian Federation.
E. I. Sobolev
Russian Federation
SOBOLEV Egor I. Intern. Student of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia.
22, p.1, Korobeynikov lane, 119034, Moscow, Russian Federation.
References
1. Buharin V.V. (2016), Components of the Digital Sovereignty of the Russian Federation as a Technical Basis for Information Security, MGIMO Review of International relations. No. 6. p. 76–91. (in Russian)
2. Efremov A.A. (2017), Formation of the Concept of Information Sovereignty of the State, Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. No. 1. P. 201-215. (in Russian)
3. Zorina E.G. (2017), Information Sovereignity of the Modern State and the Main Tools to Ensure It, Izvestiya of Saratov University. New Series. Series Sociology. Politology. Vol. 17, No. 3. P. 345–348. Doi: 10.18500/1818–9601–2017-17-3-345-348. (in Russian)
4. Zorina E.G. (2017), Distortion of the Meanings and Senses of Political and Historical Events in Multilingual Versions of Wikipedia Articles, Vlast. Vol. 25, No. 3. P. 211-214. (in Russian)
5. Ibragimova G. (2013), China’s Strategy in Cyberspace: Issues of Internet Governance and Information Security Ensuring, Security Index. No. 1 (104). P. 169-184. (in Russian)
6. Litvinov D. A. (2019), Assessment of Russia’s Cybersecurity Policy and Possible Options for its Improvement, Vestnik nauki I obrazovaniya. No. 19-2 (73). P. 76-82. (in Russian)
7. Chekmenyova T.G., Ershov B.A., Trubitsyn S.D., Ostapenko A.A. (2020), China’s Information Security Strategy: Political and Technical Aspects, Bulletin Social-Economic and Humanitarian Research. No. 7 (9). P. 78-97. (in Russian)
8. Damon L. (1986), Freedom of Information versus National Sovereignty: The Need for a New Global Forum for the Resolution of Transborder Date Flow Problems, Fordham International Law Journal. Vol. 10. Issue 2. p. 262–287.
9. Gong W. (2005), Information Sovereignty Reviewed, Intercultural Communication Studies. Vol. XIV. Issue 1. p. 119–135.
10. De Filippi P., McCarthy S. (2012), Cloud Computing: Centralization and Data Sovereignt, European Journal of Law and Technology. URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2167372.
Review
For citations:
Gribin N.P., Kohtyulina I.N., Sedunov D.I., Sobolev E.I. Information sovereignity: materials of scientific discussion. Russia & World: Sc. Dialogue. 2022;(2):100-131. https://doi.org/10.53658/RW2022-2-2(4)-100-131