Formation and evolution of russian frontiers
https://doi.org/10.53658/RW2022-2-2(4)-166-177
Abstract
It is shown in the article that the formation of Russian Frontiers was carried out primarily due to the need to ensure the security of the borders. Periods in their evolution are identified and characterized here. It is established that the first stage (the formation of a military frontier) is associated with the construction of fortified lines and the relocation of Cossacks and peasants to the lands fenced by them. The second stage is the registration of the legal status of frontier territories and the establishment of special paramilitary forms of the government. The third stage is characterized, along with the transplantation of redistributive-type institutions that dominated the institutional matrix of Russia to new lands, by the emergence and spread of market institutions here, that caused the spatial heterogeneity of the Russian institutional matrix. The final stage is defrontization, various tools were used to achieve it: improvement of the material and technological environment of acquired territories, embedding them in the general imperial legal field, spreading Orthodoxy and Russian language, economic stimulation of Russian colonization by the state, socialization of local elites and their involvement in the process of managing new lands. At all stages, the evolution of frontier territories was governed by the Russian state, and the policy was based on the principles of dialogue with the autochthonous population. The presence of frontiers hindered the transition from extensive to intensive methods of space exploration, reoriented the empire to a self-sufficient development option, and determined a special, Russian path of modernization.
About the Author
P. A. BarakhvostovBelarus
BARAKHVOSTOV Pavel Aleksandrovich. PhD (Polit.). Associate Professor. Associate Professor of the Department of Political Science.
26 Partizanskiy Avenue, 220070 Minsk, Belarus.
References
1. Astapenko, М.P. (1992), Don Cossacks: 1550–1920. Rostov-on-Don: Logos (in Russian).
2. Barakhvostov, P.A. (2021a), “Institutional Analysis of the Integration of Rzeczpospolita Lands in-to the Russian and Austrian Empires”. MGIMO Reviewer of International Relations, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 51-69 (in Russian).
3. Barakhvostov, P.A. (2021b), “The Remaking of Geopolitical Space and Institutional Transformations: The Case of The Baltic Region,” Baltic region, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 42-57. (in Russian).
4. Billington, R.A. (1975), America’s Frontier Heritage. University of New Mexico Press.
5. Goryushkin, L.М. (1967), Siberian Peasantry at the Turn of Two Centuries. Late XIX – early XX century. Novosibirsk: Nauka (in Russian).
6. Khaidov, I.М. (2020), “Russian Frontier on the Terek: Frontier Identity of the Terek Cossacks in the First Half of the 19th Century”. The Humanities and Social-Economic Sciences, No. 3, pp. 54-58 (in Russian).
7. Khodarkovsky, M. (2002), Russia’s Steppe Frontier: The Making of a Colonial Empire, 1500–1800. Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
8. Kirdina, S.G. (2014), Institutional Matrices and Russia’s Development: An Introduction to X-Y Theory, Saint-Petersburg: Nestor Istoriya (in Russian).
9. Ledonne, J. (1992), “The Frontier in Modern Russian History,” Russian History, Vol. 19, No. 1/4, pp. 143-154.
10. Levyash, I.Ya. (2016), “Cultural Alienation and Frontiers: Chasms and Bridges”. Dialog kul’tur v jepohu global’nyh riskov / by editor A.V. Danil’chenko. Minsk: RIVSh, pp. 193-196 (in Russian).
11. Mizis, Yu.А. (2012), Governor of the Moscow Kingdom R.F. Boborykin in the State Service. Tambov: Michurinsk, pp. 219-220 (in Russian).
12. Mizis, Yu.А., Skobelkin. О.V., Papkov, А.I. (2015), “The Theory of the Frontier and the South of Russia in the 16th – first half of the 18th Centuries”. Tambov University Review. Series Humanities, Vol. 20, No. 10, pp. 7-15 (in Russian).
13. North, D.C. (1991), “Institutions,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 97-112.
14. Ostrovskyi, I.V. (1991), The Agrarian Policy of Tsarism in Siberia During the Period of Imperialism. Novosibirsk: izdatel’stvo NGU (in Russian).
15. Parsons, Т. (1996), “Action Coordinate System and General Theory of Action Systems. Functional Theory of Change. The concept of Society”. Amerikanskaja sociologicheskaja mysl’. Moscow: Izd. Mezhdunarodnogo un-ta biznesa i upravlenija, pp. 462-525 (in Russian).
16. Poberezhnikov, I.V. (2013), “Frontier Modernization as a Russian Civilizational Phenomenon”. Rossija Reformirujushhajasja, Issue 12 / by ed. М.К. Gorshkov. Мoscow: Novyj hronograf, pp. 246-274 (in Russian).
17. Polanyi, K. (1977), The Livelihood of Man (Studies in Social Discontivity). N.-Y.: Academic Press.
18. Romanova, А.P., Topchiev, М.S., Sarakaeva, Е.А. (2013), “Intercultural Communications on the Frontier and Beyond the Frontier (Comparative Analysis)”. Caspian Region: Policy, Economics, Culture, No. 3, pp. 298-303 (in Russian).
19. Sanderlend, V. (2010), Ministry of Asian Russia: Never Existed, but had every Chance for this Colonial Department. Imperium inter Pares: Rol’ transfertov v Rossijskoj imperii / by ed. М. Aust, R. Vilpius, А. Мiller. Мoscow: NLO, pp. 21-39 (in Russian).
20. Semple, E.C. (2015), Influences of Geographic Environment, on the Basis of Ratzel’s System of Anthropo-geography. URL: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/15293/15293.txt.
21. Skobelev, S. (2002), “Demography as Politics. The Indigenous Population of Siberia as Part of the Russian Empire and the USSR: Population Dynamics as a Reflection of the Policy of the Center”. Ab Imperio, No. 2, pp. 149-190 (in Russian).
22. Tulaeva, S.А. (2010), “Don Cossacks in the XVI–XVII Centuries. as an Autonomous Security Organization”. Politeia, No. 2 (57), pp. 66-74 (in Russian).
23. Turner, F.J. (1932), The Significance of Sections in American History. URL: http://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/pds/gilded/empire/text1/turner.pdf.
24. Tychinskikh, Z.А., Bukanova, R.G., Muratova, S.R. (2018), Peculiarities of Frontier in Ural and Western Siberia in 16th–18th Centuries. Ural Historical Journal, No. 4, pp. 89-95 (in Russian).
25. Yakushenkov, S.N. (2016), “On the Border, the Clouds Go Gloomy, the Edge is Stern Silence Embraced”. Journal of Frontier Studies, No. 4, pp. 7-32 (in Russian).
26. Zamyatina, N.Yu. (1998), The development zone (frontier) and its image in American and Russian. Social Sciences and Contemporary World, No. 2, pp. 75-88 (in Russian).
27. Zuev, A.S. (1999), “The Specifics of the Annexation of Siberia in the Latest Russian Historiography”. Evrazija: kul’turnoe nasledie drevnih civilizacij, Issue 1, pp. 124-136.
Review
For citations:
Barakhvostov P.A. Formation and evolution of russian frontiers. Russia & World: Sc. Dialogue. 2022;(2):166-177. https://doi.org/10.53658/RW2022-2-2(4)-166-177