Friedrich Ratzel’s Law of the Spatial Growth of States in the Situation of the New World Order Formation
https://doi.org/10.53658/RW2023-3-3(9)-20-33
Abstract
In this paper, on the basis of an institutional approach, it is analyzed how fair the “law of expansion” of F. Ratzel is in the current situation of the formation of a new world order. It is shown that in modern conditions the instinct of self-preservation induces social systems not to territorial expansion due to an increase in the occupied geographical space, but to integration in various forms, which is based on a single normative approach to the mechanisms of the functioning of the union. In this sense, integration is a kind of expansion of the space occupied by society. Integration unions can increase, but up to a certain limit (saturation limit), determined not by the boundaries of geographical space, but by the possibility of developing a common position on the main issues of functioning, common norms and practices. As a rule, alliances are not absolutely symmetrical and include the “core” and the periphery of integration. The former include the most economically and politically strong states. At the same time, due to the asymmetry of the unions, the “core” institutions are transplanted to the periphery and there is a bidirectional institutional diffusion, which is due to the desire for institutional convergence, and this facilitates interaction within the union. Thus, “channels” for the institutional expansion of integrable societies are formed within the unions. Transplantation and diffusion of institutions are the mechanisms for the implementation of expansion in modern conditions. It is shown that when integrating social systems in order to mitigate possible institutional imbalances, the action of institutions that are complementary to the dominant ones in the institutional matrix is included: when integrating X-matrix countries - market ones, and vice versa.
About the Author
P. A. Barakhvostov
Belarusian State Economic University
Belarus
Belarus
Pavel A. Barakhvostov. CandSc (Polit.). Associate Professor of the Department of Political Science
Minsk
References
1. Байков А.А. Сравнительная интеграция. Практика и модели интеграции в зарубежной Европе и Тихоокеанской Азии [Comparative integration. Experience and patterns of integration in the United Europe and Asia Pacific]. М.: Аспект Пресс, 2012.
2. Барановский В.Г. Политическая интеграция в Западной Европе. Некоторые вопросы теории и практики [Political integration in the Western Europe]. М.: Наука, 1983.
3. Барахвостов П.А. Институциональные особенности интеграции земель Речи Посполитой в состав Российской и Австрийской империй [Institutional Analysis of the Integration of Rzeczpospolita Lands in-to the Russian and Austrian Empires] // Вестник МГИМО-Университета. 2021. Т. 14. № 4. С. 51–69. DOI: 10.24833/2071–8160–2021–4–79–51–69.
4. Войтович С.А. Генезис и развитие научного понятия «интеграция» [Genesis and development of scientific concept of integration] // Курс международного права. Т. 7. Международно-правовые формы интеграционных процессов в современном мире. М.: Наука, 1993.
5. Дюркгейм Э. Социология. Ее предмет, метод, предназначение [Sociology. Its subject, method, purpose]. М.: Канон, 1995.
6. Исаев Б.А. Геополитика классическая и геополитика современная [Geopolitics: classical and modern] // Полис. Политические исследования. 2011. № 2. С. 69–85.
7. Кирдина С.Г. Институциональные матрицы и развитие России: введение в X–Y теорию [Institutional matrices and development of Russia: introduction in X–Y theory]. СПб., Нестор-История, 2014.
8. Кирдина С.Г. Роль институтов и географии в экономическом развитии: актуальная полемика в гетеродоксальной экономике [The role of institutions and geography in economic development: current controversy in heterodox economics] // Пространственная экономика. 2016. № 3. С. 133–150. DOI: 10.14530/se.2016.3.133–150.
9. Либман А.М. «Интеграция снизу» в Центральной Азии [“Integration from below” in Central Asia] // Евразийская экономическая интеграция. 2009. № 1. С. 6–26.
10. Полтерович В.М. Трансплантация экономических институтов [Transplantation of economic institutions] // Экономическая наука современной России. 2001. № 3. С. 24–50.
11. Русакович А.В., Барахвостов П.А. Политика Европейского союза в отношении постсоветских государств Восточной Европы в 2004–2014 гг. [The European Union Policy towards Post-Soviet States of Eastern Europe in 2004–2014] // Журнал международного права и международных отношений. 2014. № 4. С. 9–15.
12. Трещенков Е.Ю. Европейская и евразийская модели интеграции: пределы соизмеримости [European and Eurasian integration models: the limits to their comparability] // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. 2014. № 5. С. 31–40. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2014-5-31-41.
13. Acharya A. Whose Ideas Matter? Agency and Power in Asian Regionalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2009. DOI: 10.1002/j.1538-165X.2010.tb02069.
14. Beeson M. Asymmetrical Regionalism: China, Southeast Asia and Uneven Development // East Asia. 2010. Vol. 27. No. 4. P. 329–343. DOI: 10.1007/s12140-010-9121-0.
15. Benz A. Einleitung: Governance – Modebegriff oder nützliches sozialwissenschaftliches Konzept? // Governance: Regieren in komplexen Regelsystemen/ A. Benz (ed.). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. 2004. P. 11–28.
16. Börzel T.A. European Governance: Negotiation and Competition in the Shadow of Hierarchy // Journal of Common Market Studies. 2010. Vol. 48. No. 2. P. 191–219. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2009.02049.x.
17. Brousseau E., Raynaud E. Climbing the Hierarchical Ladder of Rules: a Life–cycle Theory of Institutional Evolution // Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation. 2011. Vol. 79. No. 1. Р. 65–79. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.01.027.
18. Darwin C. Origin of Species. Literary Classics. 1900. URL: https://openlibrary.org/books/OL24352808M/The_origin_of_species (accessed 14.04.2023).
19. Etzioni A. Political Unification: a Comparative Study of Leaders and Forces. New York: Rinehart, 1965.
20. Gallup J.L., Sachs J., Mellinger A. Geography and Economic Development // International Regional Science Review. 1999. Vol. 22. P. 179–232. DOI: 10.3386/w6849.
21. Hausmann R., Pritchett L., Rodrik D. Growth Accelerations // Journal of Economic Growth. 2005. Vol. 10. No. 4. P. 303–329. DOI: 10.1007/s10887–005–4712–0.
22. Katzenstein P., Okawara N. Japan and Asian-Pacific Security // Rethinking Security in East Asia: Identity, Power, and Efficiency / J.J. Suh, P. Katzenstein and A. Carlson (eds.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2004, P. 97–130. DOI: 10.1162/016228801753399754.
23. Katzenstein P.J. A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2005. DOI: 10.7591/9781501700385.
24. Kirdina-Chandler S.G. Western and Non-Western Economic Institutional Models in Time and Geographical Space // Terra Economicus. 2019. Vol. 17. No. 1. P. 8–23. DOI: 10.23683/2073–6606–2019–17–1–8–23.
25. Knudsen T. Organizational Routines in Evolutionary Theory // Handbook of Organizational Routines. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.P, 2008. P. 125–151.
26. La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A., Vishny R.W. Law and Finance // Journal of Political Economy. 1998. Vol. 106. No. 6. P. 1113–1154. DOI: 10.1086/250042.
27. Lorenz A., Hemmer H.-R., Ahlfeld S. The Economic Growth Debate – Geography Versus Institutions: Is There Anything Really New? // Entwicklungsökonomische Diskussionsbeiträge – Discussion Papers in Development Economics. 2005. No. 34. URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/22390 (accessed: 10.05.2023).
28. Mahoney J., Thelen K. A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change // Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. P. 1–37. URL: https://assets.cambridge.org/97805211/18835/excerpt/9780521118835_excerpt.pdf (accessed: 15.04.2023).
29. Mayntz R. Über Governance. Institutionen und Prozesse politischer Regelung. Frankfurt/Main: Campus, 2009.
30. Mellinger A.D., Sachs J.D., Gallup J.L. Climate, Coastal Proximity, and Development // The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography / G.L. Clark, M.P. Feldman and M.S. Gertler (Eds.). Oxford University Press, 2000. P. 169–194.
31. Mouzelis N.P. Modern and Postmodern Social Theorizing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. URL: https://assets.cambridge.org/97805215/15856/frontmatter/9780521515856_frontmatter.pdf (accessed: 15.04.2023).
32. North D.C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511808678.
33. Parent O., Zouache A. Geographical Features vs. Institutional Factors: New Perspectives on the Growth of Africa and Middle-East // Economic Research Forum. 2009. Working Paper No. 490.
34. Parent O., Zouache A. Geography Versus Institutions: New Perspectives on the Growth of Africa and the Middle East // Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics. 2012. Vol. 168. No. 3. P. 488–518. DOI: 10.1628/093245612802921006.
35. Peters B.G. Institutional Theory in Political Science: The ‘New Institutionalism’. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, 2019.
36. Plummer P., Sheppard E. Geography Matters: Agency, Structures and Dynamics at the Intersection of Economics and Geography // Journal of Economic Geography. 2006. Vol. 6. No. 5. P. 619–637. DOI: 10.1093/jeg/lbl005.
37. Pomfret R. Different Paths to Economic Integration in Europe and Asia // ADBI Working Paper 1063. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute, 2019. Available: https://www.adb.org/publications/different-paths-economic-integration-europe-and-asia (accessed: 15.05.2023).
38. Ratzel F. History of Mankind. Vol. 1. London: Macmillan. 1896. URL: https://ia801505.us.archive.org/3/items/in.ernet.dli.2015.22248/2015.22248.The–History–Of–Mankind––Vol–1.pdf (accessed: 10.03.2023).
39. Risse T. Governance in Areas of Limited Statehood: Introduction and Overview // Governance without a State? Policies and Politics in Areas of Limited Statehood / T. Risse (ed.). New York: Columbia University Press, 2011. P. 1–35.
40. Rodríguez-Pose A. Do Institutions Matter for Regional Development? // Regional Studies. 2013. Vol. 47. No. 7. P. 1034–1047. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2012.748978.
41. Roland G. Transition and Economics. Politics, Markets and Firms. Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2000.
42. Saha B. Institutions or Geography: Which Matters Most for Economic Development? // Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics. 2013. Vol. 25. No. 1–2. P. 69–89. DOI: 10.1177/02601079145246.
43. Solingen E. Regional Order at Century’s Dawn: Global and Domestic Influences and Grand Strategy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998.
44. Stiglitz J. Distinguished Lecture on Economics in Government. The Private Uses of Public Interests: Incentives and Institutions // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 1998. Vol. 12, No. 2. P. 3–22. DOI: 10.1257/jep.12.2.3.
45. Storey D. Political Geography // International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. Elsevier. 2020. P. 199–206. DOI: 10.1016/B978–0–08–102295–5.10488–3.
46. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism / T.A. Börzel, T. Risse (eds.). Oxford University Press, 2016. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199682300.001.0001.
Review
For citations:
Barakhvostov P.A. Friedrich Ratzel’s Law of the Spatial Growth of States in the Situation of the New World Order Formation. Russia & World: Sc. Dialogue. 2023;(3):20-33. https://doi.org/10.53658/RW2023-3-3(9)-20-33
Views:
307
Email this article 