The white and red forces of the Civil War: problems of modern public interpretation of historical memory in Finland
https://doi.org/10.53658/RW2021-1-2-62-77
Abstract
The article characterizes the modern public discourse in Finland on the impact of the red and white forces on the developments unfolding in the course of the Civil War through the interpretation of historical sources. It also draws a conclusion about the transformations that historical memory has experienced in Finland over the past decades. The research tasks are solved by using the methodology of historical trauma and mechanisms of its overcoming, the historical narration of everyday life, sociological methods. The article considers the concepts of official scientific and public discourse on controversial historical issues, indicates the different functional content of these categories. The fact of granting independence to Finland in 1918, and most importantly, the fact that the independence was maintained further on, was actualized in the public narrative in 2018. On this basis, it is possible to analyze the assessment of the white and red forces within modern Finnish society, due to the higher interest to the Civil War in connection with the Jubilee data and comparatively larger number of sources on historic memory that have appeared in scientific discourse. In the interwar period, Finland saw the cult of the Civil (“Liberation”) War, where the red forces were presented as opponents of the independence of the state, and the whites, on the contrary, contributed to the acquisition of the sovereignty. However the statistical data, commemorative products, cultural phenomena presented in the article show that the public discourse about the Civil War tends to smooth the categorical evaluations, despite the fact that the discourse about the further Winter War and, moreover, the World War II tends to exacerbate the approach. The Finnish society is aware of the need to investigate crimes against the reds, preserves the memory of war crimes on both sides, and keeps the war graves of both Reds and Whites in the similar way. The rethinking of the legacy of civil confrontation is the potential for humanitarian dialogue between Russia and Finland.
Keywords
About the Author
E. A. KuzmenkoRussian Federation
Kuzmenko Elena, Candidate of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor, The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation, Member of the Russian Society for Intellectual History
82 Prospekt Vernadskogo, Building 1, Moscow, 119571
References
1. Ayerman, R. (2013), Social theory and trauma [Social’naya teoriya i travma], Sociological Review, Vol. 12. No. 1, pp. 121-138.
2. Assman, A. (2016), New dissatisfaction with memorial culture [Novoe nedovol’stvo memorial’noj kul’turoj] / Trans. from it. Boris Khlebnikov. M.: New Literary Review (in Russian)
3. Assman, Ya. (2004), Cultural memory. Writing, memory of the past and political identity in the High cultures of antiquity, Moscow: Languages of Slavic culture
4. Bezzubova, O.V. (2016), Museum and the Memory Policy [Muzej i politika pamyati], International Journal of Cultural Studies, №3 (24), pp. 76-84 (in Russian)
5. Buldakov, V.P. (2018), Perception of the Civil War in Finland by Russian society in 1918 [Vospriyatie Grazhdanskoj vojny v Finlyandii rossijskim obshchestvom v 1918 godu], Almanac of Northern European and Baltic Studies, pp. 421–436 (in Russian)
6. Gasumyanov, V.I. and Komleva, V.V. (2020), “Communication modes as a factor of intercountry interactions: problem statement”, International Affairs [“Kommunikatsionnye rezhimy kak faktor mezhstranovykh vzaimodeistvii: postanovka problemy”, Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn], No. 10, pp. 38-49 (in Russian).
7. Haapala, P., Tikka, M. (2014), Revolution, Civil War and Terror in Finland (1918). War during peace. Paramilitary conflicts after the First World War: 1917-1923. M., pp. 109-126.
8. Mazur, L.N. (2013), The image of the past: the formation of historical memory [Obraz proshlogo: formirovanie istoricheskoj pamyati], Proceedings of the Ural Federal University. Ser. 2, Humanities, No. 3, pp. 243-256 (in Russian)
9. Rupasov, I. (2018), Civil War in Finland [Grazhdanskaya vojna v Finlyandii], St. Petersburg Historical Journal, No. 3, pp. 171-186 (in Russian)
10. LaCapra, D. (2001), Writing History, Writing Trauma, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
11. Shtompka, P. (2002), Cultural Trauma in Post-Communist Society: (Article Two) / Trans. by V.V. Repyev and N.V. Romanovsky, Sociological research, No. 2., pp. 3-12
12. Smolin, A.V. (2002), The Baltic States (Estonia, Latvia) and Finland in the politics of Russian conservatives during the Civil War. Conservatism and Liberalism: History and Modern Concepts. Materials of the International Scientific Conference, February 15, 2002 / Edited by A.S. Kartsova. SPb., pp. 153-160 (in Russian)
13. Svechnikov, M.S. (1923), Revolution and Civil war in Finland. 1917-1918: (memories and materials) [Revolyuciya i grazhdanskaya vojna v Finlyandii], Moscow - Petrograd. (in Russian)
Review
For citations:
Kuzmenko E.A. The white and red forces of the Civil War: problems of modern public interpretation of historical memory in Finland. Russia & World: Sc. Dialogue. 2021;1(2):62-77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.53658/RW2021-1-2-62-77