Intercivilizational dialogue: The possibilities of local civilisations
https://doi.org/10.53658/RW2022-2-1(3)-142-159
Abstract
The article contains the basics of a scientific discussion held at the National Research Institute for the Development of Communications (NIIRC). In the course of the discussion, the issues of the methodology of civilizations studies , the complexity of the formation of the conceptual apparatus, different facets of the problems in civilizations dialogue, features and potential of local civilizations were discussed. Common approaches and differences in them, the issues of the ability of civilizations to a dialogue, subjectivity in the inter civilizational dialogue are revealed. It was proposed to use a rhythmic cascade approach, which can contribute to the development of the methodology of comparative analysis of civilizations, the increment of scientific knowledge in this field of scientific research. The participants drew attention to the constant factors determining the evolution of civilizations at the present time, to the possibilities of a constructive dialogue of civilizations. In the course of the discussion, the features of the Russian type of modernization, which developed under the conditions of a vast frontier in Asian Russia, cultural and historical tradition as a mechanism of interethnic dialogue in Russian- Ossetian relations, the community of social cultural codes between Russia and Ossetia are considered.
About the Authors
V. G. Budanov
Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
BUDANOV Vladimir G. DSc (Philos.), CandSc (Phys.&Math.). Chief Researcher; expert of the Centre of Interdisciplinary Studies named after Kurdumov S.P. «SRETENSKY CLUB»
14 Volkhonka Street, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation
M. M. Kuchukov
Kabardino-Balkarian State Agrarian University named after V.M. Kokov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
KUCHUKOV Magomed M. DSc (Philos.). Professor of the Department of History and Philosophy
109a Tolstogo str., Nalchik, 360004, Russian Federation
P. A. Barakhvostov
Belarusian State University of Economics
Belarus
Belarus
BARAKHVOSTOV Pavel A. CandSc (Pol.). Associate Professor of the Department of Political Science
26 Partizansky Ave., Minsk, 220070, Belarus
I. B. Sanakoev
South Ossetian State University
South Ossetia
South Ossetia
SANAKOEV Inal B. CandSc (Pol.). Head of the Department of Political Science and Sociology
100001, Republic of South Ossetia, Tskhinval, Ostrovsky str., 85
K. G. Dzugaev
South Ossetian Scientific Research Institute named after Z.N. Vaneev
South Ossetia
South Ossetia
DZUGAEV Kosta G. CandSc (Philos.). Associate Professor of the Department of Philosophy and Cultural Studies
100001, Republic of South Ossetia, Tskhinval, June 8, Dzugaev lane, 2,
A. S. Shokhov
Centre for the Implementation of Strategic Projects
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
SHOKHOV Alexander S. Candidate of Philosophy (PhD). General Director
References
1. Budanov, V.G. (2021), “On the possibility of integral ethics of the great anthropological transition,” [O vozmozhnosti integralnoi etiki bolshogo anthropologicheskogo perekhoda“] Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management, Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 260-269. (In Russian)
2. Budanov, V.G. (2007), Methodology of synergetics in postnonclassical science and education [O vozmozhnosti integralnoi etiki bolshogo anthropologicheskogo perekhoda“]. Moscow: URSS. Chapter 4. The method of rhythmic cascades. (In Russian)
3. Budanov, V.G. (2009), “Rhythmic cascades of history and forecast of development of sociopsychological archetypes of Russia until 2050,”), [“Ritmokaskady istorii I prognoz razvitiya sotsialno pkhologicheskikh arkhetipov Rossii do до 2050 goda,”] Synergetic paradigm. Social synergetics, Moscow, Progress-Tradition, pp. 234-264. (In Russian)
4. Budanov, V.G. (2018), “Nonlocal quantum-synergetic ontologies of archetypes of social development: rhythmic cascade schedule of wars and revolutions,” [“Neolokalnye kvantovo sinergeticheskie ontologii arkhetipov obshchestvennogo razvitiya: ritmokaskadnoie raspisanie voin I revolutsi.”] SocioTime, No. 3 (15), pp. 85-99. (In Russian)
5. Bukanova, R.G., Tychinskikh, Z.A., Muratova, S.R. (2018), “Features of the frontier in the Urals and Western Siberia in the XVI-XVIII centuries,” [“Osobennosti frontira na Urale i v Zapadnoi Sibiri v XVI–XVIII v.v..,”] Ural Historical Bulletin, No. 4, pp. 89-95. (In Russian)
6. Levyash, I.Ya. (2016), Cultural alienation and frontiers: chasms and bridges. Dialogue of cultures in the Era of Global risks [Kulturnoie otchuzdenie i frontiry: propasti I mosty. Dialog kultur v epokhu globalnykh riskov]., edited by A.V. Danilchenko, Riga, Minsk, pp. 193-196. (In Russian)
7. Mizis, Yu.A., Skobelkin, O.V., Papkov, A.I. (2015), “The theory of the frontier and the South of Russia in the XVI – first half of the XVIII century,” [“Teoria frontira I Yug Rossii v XVI – pervoi polovine XVIII veka”] Bulletin of TSU, Vol. 20. No. 10, pp. 7-15. (In Russian)
8. Momdjian, K.H. (2012), “The crisis of fragmentation of modern social philosophy,” [“Krizis fragmentazii sovremennoi sotsialnoi filosofii”] Bulletin of the Moscow University. Ser. 7: Philosophy. (In Russian)
9. Parsons, T. (1996), The coordinate system of action and the general theory of action systems. Functional theory of change. The concept of society [Sistema koordinat deistviya I obshchaya teoriya system deistviya. Funktsionalnaiya teoriya izmeneniya. Ponyatie obtschestva. Amerikanskaiya sotsiologicheskaiya mysl]. American Sociological Thought, Ed. of the International University of Business and Management, Moscow, pp. 462-525. (In Russian)
10. Yakushenkov, S.N. (2016), “Clouds walk gloomily on the border, the harsh edge is embraced by silence,” [“Na ganize tuchi khodyat khmuro, krai surovy tishinoi ob’yat] Bulletin of the Boundaries of Research, No. 4, pp. 7-32. (In Russian)
11. Khodarkovsky, M. (2002), Steppe Frontier of Russia: The Making of a Colonial Empire, 1500–1800, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indianapolis.
12. Turner, F.J. (1920), The Meaning of Sections in American History, available at: URL: http://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/pds/gilded/empire/text1/turner.pdf. Date of application: 15.01.2021.
13. Zamyatina, N.Yu. (1998), “The zone of development (frontier) and its image in American and Russian cultures,” Social Sciences and Modernity, No. 2, pp. 75-88.
Review
For citations:
Budanov V.G., Kuchukov M.M., Barakhvostov P.A., Sanakoev I.B., Dzugaev K.G., Shokhov A.S. Intercivilizational dialogue: The possibilities of local civilisations. Russia & World: Sc. Dialogue. 2022;(1):142-159. https://doi.org/10.53658/RW2022-2-1(3)-142-159
Views:
772
Email this article 